WaiMAP
Maps, data, engineering engines, AI and reports in one workflow
Each line shows a video, a demonstration project generated with the WaiMAP engines, its sample report and a direct way in.
Video coming soonSolar, wind, storage, hydropower and the grid — from site screening to construction and operation.
Video coming soonTerrain, earthworks, linear infrastructure, facilities and progress — planned versus actual.
Video coming soonParcels, constraints, infrastructure and development scenarios for land and property decisions.
Video coming soonHGV routes, vehicle limits, abnormal loads and project cargo to energy and construction sites.
Video coming soonObserve → Compare → Interpret → Alert & Report, for sites, assets and their surroundings.
The demonstrations are generated with the WaiMAP engines on open data — they are not real projects. Real project material is added only after client approval. Who WaiMAP is for · Video centre · Free Site Check
No installation. Open the map, follow the steps — every tool shows them.
Open data loads for the site (terrain, OpenStreetMap, climate, hazards, protected areas); add your survey, CAD, GIS, drone, document and time-series files.
Choose the sector and the project type, draw or import the site, route or layout, and set the parameters — or start from a sample.
Engines compute terrain, layout, energy, quantities, cost, finance and risks with stated methods, sources and assumptions.
Reports, Excel, CAD and GIS deliverables for the decision; revisions, progress and site observations keep the project current.
How the solutions are delivered: one project, one map, many engines — each with stated methods, sources and outputs.
A shared layer catalogue (terrain, energy, environment, risk, imagery, demand) with licence and attribution per layer; your Shapefile, KML, GeoJSON, DXF, GeoTIFF, LAS and Excel files.
Global DEM or your own survey model, slope and aspect, profiles, cut / fill platforms, drainage, catchments and hazards.
Solar, wind, BESS, hydropower, grid, lines, substations, water, earthworks, ground models — computed, with independent checks against open tools.
One project with typed assets and IDs, named drawing revisions, analysis history, BoQ, programme and budget, shared with the team by code.
A Sentinel-2 cloudless background (latest scenes when configured), drone orthophotos and point clouds, plans and photos placed on the map by control points.
Truck routes with vehicle dimensions, abnormal-load checks, least-cost corridors for lines and pipelines, reach areas.
Observation areas compared with a reference date: mapping changes, earthquakes and active fires; drone orthophotos compared date by date; revisions compared element by element.
PDF, PowerPoint, HTML, Excel, DXF, KML, GeoJSON, GeoTIFF; an MCP API for Business plans; QR verification of issued reports.
Revisions, observation areas, drone surveys and analysis history answer the same six questions.
The reference: a saved revision, a baseline date of an observation area, an earlier orthophoto or analysis.
The current drawing, the latest check, the newest orthophoto or a re-evaluation with new inputs.
Added, removed, moved or reshaped elements; new construction sites, roads or buildings in the mapping; events in the area.
On the map, element by element, with the old position as a ghost and a click-to-zoom list.
Displacement and largest deviation in metres, length and area changes, alert severity, KPI differences between analyses.
Open alerts to verify or dismiss on site, a comparison report and an Excel export for the team.
Results you can check: where the data comes from, how the engines were tested, how a report can be verified and where the limits are.
Reports generated by the engines from public data — open one, then run the same study on your site.
Every catalogue layer carries its licence and attribution; reports name their sources and dates; the Data Trust module keeps an evidence register.
Engines compared with open reference tools and published cases — values, differences, tool versions and dates.
Issued reports carry a serial; with verification active a QR code lets the reader check the file on the verify page.
Study level: concept, feasibility and early design. What WaiMAP does not do is listed, not hidden.
Every study ends in a document with an official cover (document no., revision, status, revision table, disclaimer). Depth varies by sector and module; the structure stays the same:
Generated by the WaiMAP engines from public data. Open one, then press "Try it yourself" to run the same study on your site.
Loading samples…
Most files are read in the browser and stay on your device. DWG, LAZ, very large rasters and drone image sets use the optional compute worker.
The engines are checked against reference software, published tables and real studies. Most of these checks run in the automated test suite on every release. The validation report lists every comparison with values, differences, tool versions and dates (PDF and JSON).
| Engine | Reference | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Short circuit (IEC 60909) | pandapower and a hand calculation, 154 / 33 kV test network | Ik″ max 13.85 kA — identical |
| Sag-tension (state change) | Independent exact-catenary calculation, ACSR conductor, 300 m span | Sag at 75 °C 8.530 m — identical |
| Water network solver (GGA) | EPANET 2.2 (via WNTR), two-loop benchmark network | Max head difference 0.0003 m |
| Storm sewer routing | SWMM 5 (via PySWMM), same network | Outfall peak 862 vs 860 L/s |
| Steam properties (IAPWS-IF97) | IAPWS verification tables | Relative deviation ≤ 2 × 10⁻⁹ |
| Hydrogen storage density | CoolProp, 350 bar | 23.995 kg/m³ — identical |
| GeoTIFF reader | GDAL on six reference rasters (LZW, Deflate, PackBits, BigTIFF, predictors) | Identical values |
| Mass haul optimisation | OR-Tools min-cost flow; textbook transportation problems | Same optimum (relative 5 × 10⁻¹⁶) |
| Point-cloud ground filter | Synthetic terrain with known ground and objects | Ground recall 99.98 %, DTM RMSE 0.07 m |
| Battery dispatch | Analytic two-price arbitrage | Reproduced exactly |
| PV energy yield | Commercial satellite-data yield assessment of a bifacial tracker plant (licensed data) | Green band — values not published (licensed reference) |
| Wind energy yield | Published per-turbine yield of a 6.25 MW low-wind site | 21.15 vs 20.09 GWh (+5 %) |
| Project finance model | Published feasibility study of a 400 MW wind farm | IRR 10.7 vs 10.3 %; LCOE 88.00 vs 88.06 USD/MWh |
| Hydropower study method | Replication of a feasibility study; EPC bill of quantities | Energy 48.7 vs 49.3 GWh; cost within 7 % of the BoQ |
| Substation estimator | Awarded tender for a 154 / 33 kV GIS substation; turnkey offer for a 400 kV GIS | 53.7 vs 53 k USD/MVA; within 13 % |
| PV energy yield (same inputs) | NREL PySAM Pvwattsv8 7.1 and pvlib 0.16 ModelChain; 10 MWp fixed tilt and tracker on one typical year | Specific yield 1.8–3.3 % below the two tools (WaiMAP adds row and diffuse shading, IAM, own inverter model) |
| Bifacial rear side (infinite sheds) | pvlib 0.16 infinite_sheds; 10 MWp bifacial tracker on a 10 % slope, same geometry | Rear gain 5.76 vs 5.76 % (+0.07 %); rear irradiation 177.6 vs 177.6 kWh/m² |
| Inverter clipping (Sandia model) | pvlib 0.16 inverter.sandia and NREL PySAM 7.1 Pvsandiainv on the same hourly DC power | 31.11 MWh — identical (both tools) |
| Slope-aware backtracking | pvlib 0.16 tracking.singleaxis with cross-axis tilt (Anderson & Mikofski 2020), same sun angles | Largest hourly angle difference 0.0002°; row shading identical |
| Stringing, row shading, pile grading | Hand calculations (IEC 62548-1 Voc at −10 °C; shaded fraction geometry; pile reveal on a 12 % slope) | 27 modules; shaded fraction 0.3246; 13.44 m³ — identical |
| Wind wake losses (same inputs) | PyWake 2.6 NOJ / Jensen, 5 turbines, same hourly series, curves and layout | Gross AEP identical; wake loss 3.11 vs 3.11 %, net AEP within 0.004 % |
| Wind Gaussian wakes (same settings) | PyWake 2.6 BastankhahGaussianDeficit, 5 and 20 turbines and an optimised layout, same hourly series | Wake loss 2.71 vs 2.70 % and 5.38 vs 5.37 %; net AEP within 0.02 % |
| Battery dispatch optimum | PyPSA 1.2 linear programme with HiGHS; 100 MW / 2 h on a synthetic price year | WaiMAP 0.35 % below the LP optimum (an upper bound) |
| Load flow | pandapower 3.5 and PyPSA 1.2 AC power flow, radial plant connection | Bus voltages within 0.003 %, losses within 0.005 % |
| Line sag-tension (same inputs) | Independent Python change-of-state solver (exact catenary length + elastic strain integral); ACSR Drake tension section, six IEC 60826 weather cases | Tensions and sags within 0.06 % (e.g. sag at 80 °C 12.605 vs 12.606 m) |
| Conductor ampacity (IEEE 738) | linerate 5.0 IEEE738 model, same conductor, weather and solar input | 721.3 vs 721.6 A at 75 °C; 977.1 vs 977.3 A at 100 °C (−0.03 %) |
| Optimum tower spotting | Exhaustive enumeration of every feasible tower sequence on two small profiles (same constraints) | Same minimum cost (233,929 and 194,067 USD) |
References are described, not named, where they are client or project documents. A matching test case shows the method is implemented correctly; it does not make a feasibility result bankable on its own. Full list: validation report.
WaiMAP is built for the stage where decisions are made fast: where to build, what it takes, what it costs and whether it pays. It is not a substitute for detailed design.
| Works alongside / hands over to | Format |
|---|---|
| GIS (ArcGIS, QGIS) | Shapefile, GeoJSON, KML, GeoTIFF, CSV |
| CAD (AutoCAD and DXF-based tools) | DXF with layers |
| Overhead-line design (PLS-CADD) | Survey points as PFL-style station / offset / elevation / feature-code text and XYZ with a feature-code table to map in PLS-CADD, staking table (CSV / Excel), weather cases, DXF plan & profile — not native .DON / .BAK files |
| PV design (PVsyst, SAM) | Typical-year weather files in their formats, layout DXF |
| Survey / point-cloud tools | LAS, GeoTIFF DTM / DSM |
Product names belong to their owners. WaiMAP writes standard formats these tools read; it does not write their native project files.
Projects published by WaiMAP users. Build your report in WaiMAP, press Share / gallery, and you get a private link at once. After review it appears here as well.
Loading the gallery…
Start free. Subscribe when the reports become part of your work — each plan includes everything in the one before. Prices in USD, excl. VAT; AI usage is billed from your WAI W$ balance, separately from the plan.
Anyone can sign up with any e-mail address and buy online. Company plans can add colleagues by e-mail.
Explore mode on the map · Point analysis · Climate & surroundings · 3 reports a day
Everything in Free, plus: All modes for small projects (per project: 200 kW, 0.5 MWh, 1 kV, 1,000 m², 5 ha, 1 km pipe) · 3 projects · WAI assistant · Field GPS survey
Everything in Personal, plus: Projects up to 50 MW / 36 kV · 25 projects · Feasibility-grade client reports (WaiMAP-branded) · CAD + DXF
Everything in Pro, plus: All Pro tools for every user · Stress test & weak links, FEM, harmonics, surge and protection studies · 3D sections, clearance display and stress overlay in Project 3D · Dynamic studies: modal, response spectrum, time history, turbine, conductor, transient stability and foundations
Everything in Team, plus: API / MCP access for your systems · Bankability-readiness reports · Projects up to 1 GW / 400 kV · 500 projects
Everything in Business, plus: SSO (rolling out) · Data region / on-premise option (by agreement) · O&M & predictive maintenance (rolling out) · Custom data integration
Portfolio screening, a monitoring programme, custom data integration, on-premise or data-region options, SSO (rolling out) or an SLA — tell us about the project and we will reply by e-mail.
One app for web, desktop and mobile. It installs from the browser in seconds, opens in its own window and updates by itself.
Chrome or Edge → Install
Chrome / Edge → Install, or Safari → File → Add to Dock
Chrome menu ⋮ → Install app